Mark and Charlie's Blog

Blog > Mark and Charlie's Blog > In Hobby Lobby Ruling, a Court So Wrong in So Many Ways

In Hobby Lobby Ruling, a Court So Wrong in So Many Ways

In its much-anticipated Hobby Lobby ruling, the Supreme Court has ruled by the usual 5-4 margin that closely held corporations cannot be required to provide contraception coverage. The ruling was narrowly tailored to apply only to the Obamacare contraception mandate and no other insurance mandates and explicitly does not shield employers who might rely on religious grounds to justify other discrimination. That said, while the ruling could have been worse, it's still dumb.

At the heart of both Hobby Lobby and its sister case Conestoga Wood is the requirement under the Affordable Care Act that employer-provided health insurance plans include coverage for basic preventative care. The law outlines what such preventative care encompasses and includes contraception. Contraception is, after all, by definition prevention. But two private for-profit corporations, Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, both argued that for their insurance plans to be forced to cover contraception would violate the companies' freedom of religion. Hobby Lobby, which sells arts and crafts materials, is owned by devout Southern Baptists. Conestoga Wood, which makes wood cabinets, is owned by conservative Mennonites.

Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/30/in-hobby-lobby-ruling-a-court-so-wrong-in-so-many-ways.html

Mark and Charlie's Blog

An Austin police officer on Monday morning shot and killed an 18-year-old black man who police said was naked and...
Travis County prosecutor Erika Arroyo Hansen was arrested Sunday and charged with driving while intoxicated after...
On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, Hillary Clinton’s quest to become the country’s first female president...
Those who pass a stopped Austin ISD bus with its crossing arm extended will be issued a ticket starting Monday...
A Chicago police officer who fatally shot a college student and his 55-year-old neighbor has filed a lawsuit...